Home News Valve Hits Back When Apple Issues Subpoena In Legal Battle With Epic Games Over Fortnite

Valve Hits Back When Apple Issues Subpoena In Legal Battle With Epic Games Over Fortnite

Valve Hits Back When Apple Issues Subpoena In Legal Battle With Epic Games Over Fortnite

Back in August 2020, Fortnite was pulled from the iOS App Store (and later on from Google Play too) in a fight in between Epic Games and Apple over user contract terms. The whole legal fight ended up being untidy rapidly and led to a #FreeFortnite project performed in the design of George Orwell’s 1984. As the legal battle continues in between the 2 tech giants, Apple has actually chosen to toss Valve into the mix by dishing out a subpoena back in November 2020 (as exposed in a brand-new court filing that was openly launched). The PC business didn’t take that gently and resisted with a range of points versus the subpoena, particularly that it has definitely no to do with Fortnite. 

The subpoena in concern needs that Valve provide Apple a lots of information about Steam sales and a myriad of other marketing machinations connected to the digital store. The basis for this pull was, according to Apple, that Valve holds essential details with its sales information that might be utilized versus Epic Games in the procedures to come. Being the biggest store in the PC video gaming area (though Epic Games has actually its own that has been growing progressively), Apple intended to utilize the information gathered to assist protect a win in its battle versus the computer game giant. Valve and Apple both have actually “taken part in a number of fulfill and gives” however completion outcome has actually stayed the exact same: Valve isn’t budging when it concerns Apple’s need with Request 2 and Request 32

Apple desires the names of each and every single item on Steam along with rates, dates of release, and setups about whatever on and around the store. Sales information, user information, and more are all consisted of in the business’s legal plea. Valve states that the details preferred is “private or too difficult to gather in the manner Apple requested.

In response to the effort to collect Valve’s data to gain a clearer picture of Epic Games’ impact within the market, Valve is refusing to deliver said data in the form that Apple is requesting. The reason? It has nothing to do with Fortnite, which is the core of these proceedings. Valve’s hitback against Apple includes the following counterpoint in a joint statement to Magistrate Judge Hixson: 

Valve is a privately held company with approximately 350 employees that develops PC video games. Valve does not make or sell phones, tablets, or video games for mobile devices, or otherwise compete in the mobile market. Valve also operates Steam, an online platform that lets users purchase and play PC games on their laptops and desktops. Steam users cannot buy or use mobile apps on Steam. Over 30,000+ PC games are available on Steam, over 99% of which were made by third parties other than Valve. Most of these games can also be bought elsewhere, including from developers directly, from brick and mortar retail, or on other PC game platforms. Third party developers that offer their games on Steam control all pricing and content. Valve collects the purchase price from Steam users and remits the proceeds to the third party developer net of a revenue share to Valve. Fortnite is not available on Steam, and Epic has publicly and unequivocally stated it will not offer Fortnite on Steam unless Valve changes its business model.

In response to Apple’s 46 documents requests, Valve already produced documents regarding its revenue share, competition with Epic, Steam distribution contracts, and other documents. Apple was not satisfied and demands—without offering to cover Valve’s costs, which would be significant—that Valve (i) recreate six years’ worth of PC game and item sales for hundreds of third party video games, then (ii) produce a massive amount of private information about these games and Valve’s revenues.

Valve also insists that despite Apple claiming its requests are “narrow,” the ask is anything but. Because of this “burden,” Valve is still refusing to supply the data in the asked for format from Apple in its case against Epic Games. Valve also maintains a stance that “Apple seeks materials that Valve does not create or keep in the ordinary course of business” and that many of the points being sought after “have little to no value.” 

Apple, of course, disputes this, saying that the company’s asks are fair and it makes sense that Valve should “do all this work and incur this disruption” because Samsung — another public company that competes in the mobile app market — produced similar reports. Public companies maintain the records in the format that Apple is asking for, but Valve is a privately  held company that does not implement external shareholders and therefore is “not subject to public regulator reporting and auditing requirements.” 

Epic Games’ Tim Sweeney made a massive Twitter thread to talk about the latest development, fighting back versus Apple’s monopoly: 


For a little backstory: The legal clash between Epic Games and Apple has been a long time coming, though it came to an interesting head when the business added an alternative way to acquire in-video game items that bypassed the mandatory 30% cut awarded to Apple last year. When Epic implemented this cheaper alternative for players, Apple responded by immediately removing the game from its store, effectively cutting off access to mobile and tablet users. 

This move immediately prompted Epic Games to take to the game’s Twitter account to share a video presenting the ongoing event as a 1984-esque nightmare, painting itself as the rebellion against unfair earnings practices. While that may seem ironic to have two billion-dollar business going at it, it’s important to remember that Epic has actually walked its talk numerous times in the past when it comes to earnings and cut procedures.

It will be intriguing to see completion outcome of this legal battle. One thing is particular, nevertheless: It’s not going to be over anytime quickly. 

[Source: Court documents, CourtListener.com via PC Gamer]


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here